Popular Searches:

drugs

viagra

diet pills
drugs prescription drugs weight loss drugs drugs online discount drugs drugstore drugs for depression online drugstore online drugs canadian drugs cheap drugs nc drugs facilities fertility drugs canada drugs brands only drugs acyclovir adipex ambien antibiotic carisoprodol celebrex didrex diet pills discount xenical hydrocodone ionamin lortab meridia online soma paxil penis enlargement phentermine prevacid prilosec propecia prozac renova retin-a senior health soma sonata tenuate tramadol ultram valium valtrex vaniqa viagra vicodin vioxx vitamin wagering weight weight loss wellbutrin women health xanax xenical xenical online zocor zoloft zovirax zyban zyrtec
A1, A2, B, C1, C2, D, E, F, G-H, I-K, L, M, N, O, P1, P2, Q-R, S, T, U-V, W-Z

Cellcept Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Studies, Metabolism - Mycophenolate Mofetil

Cellcept Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Studies, Metabolism - Mycophenolate Mofetil

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

Mycophenolate mofetil has been demonstrated in experimental animal models to prolong the survival of allogeneic transplants (kidney, heart, liver, intestine, limb, small bowel, pancreatic islets, and bone marrow).

Mycophenolate mofetil has also been shown to reverse ongoing acute rejection in the canine renal and rat cardiac allograft models. Mycophenolate mofetil also inhibited proliferative arteriopathy in experimental models of aortic and heart allografts in rats, as well as in primate cardiac xenografts. Mycophenolate mofetil was used alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive agents in these studies. Mycophenolate mofetil has been demonstrated to inhibit immunologically-mediated inflammatory responses in animal models and to inhibit tumor development and prolong survival in murine tumor transplant models.

Mycophenolate mofetil is rapidly absorbed following oral administration and hydrolyzed to form MPA, which is the active metabolite. MPA is a potent, selective, uncompetitive, and reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), and therefore inhibits the de novo pathway of guanosine nucleotide synthesis without incorporation into DNA. Because T- and B-lymphocytes are critically dependent for their proliferation on de novo synthesis of purines whereas other cell types can utilize salvage pathways, MPA has potent cytostatic effects on lymphocytes. MPA inhibits proliferative responses of T- and B-lymphocytes to both mitogenic and allospecific stimulation. Addition of guanosine or deoxyguanosine reverses the cytostatic effects of MPA on lymphocytes. MPA also suppresses antibody formation by B-lymphocytes. MPA prevents the glycosylation of lymphocyte and monocyte glycoproteins that are involved in intercellular adhesion to endothelial cells and may inhibit recruitment of leukocytes into sites of inflammation and graft rejection. Mycophenolate mofetil did not inhibit early events in the activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, such as the production of interleukin-1(IL-1) and interleukin-2(IL-2), but did block the coupling of these events to DNA synthesis and proliferation.

Pharmacokinetics

Following oral and IV administration, mycophenolate mofetil undergoes rapid and complete metabolism to MPA, the active metabolite. Oral absorption of the drug is rapid and essentially complete. MPA is metabolized to form the phenolic glucuronide of MPA (MPAG) which is not pharmacologically active. The parent drug, mycophenolate mofetil, can be measured systemically during the intravenous infusion; however, shortly (about 5 minutes) after the infusion is stopped or after oral administration, MMF concentration is below the limit of quantitation (0.4 µg/mL).

Absorption: In 12 healthy volunteers, the mean absolute bioavailability of oral mycophenolate mofetil relative to IV mycophenolate mofetil (based on MPA AUC) was 94%. The area under the plasma-concentration time curve (AUC) for MPA appears to increase in a dose-proportional fashion in renal transplant patients receiving multiple doses of mycophenolate mofetil up to a daily dose of 3 g (see table below on pharmacokinetic parameters in renal and cardiac transplant patients).

The Cmax and AUC of MPA in early transplant patients (<40 days posttransplant) are approximately 45% to 50% and 20% to 30% lower, respectively, as compared to healthy volunteers or to stable renal and cardiac transplant patients.

Food (27 g fat, 650 calories) had no effect on the extent of absorption MPA AUC) of mycophenolate mofetil when administered at doses of 1.5 g bid to renal transplant patients. However, MPA Cmax was decreased by 40% in the presence of food (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

Distribution: The mean (± SD) apparent volume of distribution of MPA in 12 healthy volunteers is approximately 3.6 (+ 1.5) and 4.0 (+ 1.2) L/kg following IV and oral administration, respectively. MPA, at clinically relevant concentrations, is 97% bound to plasma albumin. MPAG is 82% bound to plasma albumin at MPAG concentration ranges that are normally seen in stable renal transplant patients; however, at higher MPAG concentrations (observed in patients with renal impairment or delayed graft function), the binding of MPA may be reduced as a result of competition between MPAG and MPA for protein binding. Mean blood to plasma ratio of radioactivity concentrations was approximately 0.6 indicating that MPA and MPAG do not extensively distribute into the cellular fractions of blood.

In vitro studies to evaluate the effect of other agents on the binding of MPA to human serum albumin (HSA) or plasma proteins showed that salicylate (at 25 mg/dL with HSA) and MPAG (at >460 µg/mL with plasma proteins) increased the free fraction of MPA. At concentrations that exceeded what is encountered clinically, cyclosporine, digoxin, naproxen, prednisone, propranolol, tacrolimus, theophylline, tolbutamide, and warfarin did not increase the free fraction of MPA. MPA at concentrations as high as 100 µg/mL had little effect on the binding of warfarin, digoxin or propranolol, but decreased the binding of theophylline from 53% to 45% and phenytoin from 90% to 87%.

Metabolism: Following oral and intravenous dosing, mycophenolate mofetil undergoes complete metabolism to MPA, the active metabolite. Metabolism to MPA occurs presystemically after oral dosing. MPA is metabolized principally by glucuronyl transferase to form the phenolic glucuronide of MPA (MPAG) which is not pharmacologically active. In vivo, MPAG is converted to MPA via enterohepatic recirculation. The following metabolites of the 2-hydroxyethyl-morpholino moiety are also recovered in the urine following oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil to healthy subjects: N-(2-carboxymethyl)-morpholine, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-morpholine, and the N-oxide of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-morpholine.

Secondary peaks in the plasma MPA concentration-time profile are usually observed 6 to 12 hours postdose. The coadministration of cholestyramine (4 g tid) resulted in approximately a 40% decrease in the MPA AUC (largely as a consequence of lower concentrations in the terminal portion of the profile). These observations suggest that enterohepatic recirculation contributes to MPA plasma concentrations.

Increased plasma concentrations of mycophenolate mofetil metabolites (MIPA 50% increase and MPAG about 3-fold to 6-fold increase) are observed in patients with renal insufficiency (see Special Populations).

Excretion: Negligible amount of drug is excreted as MPA (<1% of dose) in the urine. Orally administered radiolabeled mycophenolate mofetil resulted in complete recovery of the administered dose, with 93% of the administered dose recovered in the urine and 6% recovered in feces. Most (about 87%) of the administered dose is excreted in the urine as MPAG. At clinically encountered concentrations, MPA and MPAG are usually not removed by hemodialysis. However, at high MPAG plasma concentrations (>100 µg/mL), small amounts of MPAG are removed. Bile acid sequestrants, such as cholestyramine, reduce MPA AUC by interfering with enterohepatic circulation of the drug (see OVERDOSAGE).

Mean (± SD) apparent half-life and plasma clearance of MPA are 17.9 (+ 6.5) hours and 193 (+ 48) mL/min following oral administration and 16.6 (+ 5.8) hours and 177 (+ 31) mL/min following IV administration, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers, Renal, and Cardiac Transplant Patients: Shown below are the mean (± SD) pharmacokinetic parameters for MPA following the administration of oral mycophenolate mofetil given as single doses to healthy volunteers and multiple doses to renal and cardiac transplant patients. After oral dosing the Cmax and AUC of MPA in early transplant patients (<40 days posttransplant) are approximately 45% to 50% and 20% to 30% lower, respectively, as compared to healthy volunteers or to stable renal and cardiac transplant patients. Mean MPA AUC values following administration of 1 g bid intravenous mycophenolate mofetil over 2 hours to patients for 5 days were about 24% higher than those observed after oral administration of a similar dose in the immediate posttransplant phase.

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for MPA [mean (± SD)]
Following Administration of Mycophenolate Mofetil to Healthy Volunteers (Single Dose),
Renal and Cardiac Transplant Patients (Multiple Doses)  

  Dose/Route T max
(h)
C max
(µg/ mL)
Total AUC
(µg· h/ mL)
Healthy Volunteers
(Single Dose)
1 g/oral 0.80
(± 0.36)
(n= 129)
24.5
(± 9.5)
(n= 129)
63.9
(± 16.2)
(n= 117)
Renal Transplant
Patients (bid dosing)
Time After
Transplantation
Dose/Route T max
(h)
C max
(µg/ mL)
Interdosing
Interval AUC 0-12
(µg· h/ mL)
5 days 1 g/iv 1.58
(± 0.46)
(n= 31)
12.0
(± 3.82)
(n= 31)
40.8
(± 11.4)
(n= 31)
6 days 1 g/oral 1.33
(± 1.05)
(n= 31)
10.7
(± 4.83)
(n= 31)
32.9
(± 15.0)
(n= 31)
Early (< 40 days) 1 g/oral 1.31
(± 0.76)
(n= 25)
8.16
(± 4.50)
(n= 25)
27.3
(± 10.9)
(n= 25)
Early (< 40 days) 1.5 g/oral 1.21
(± 0.81)
(n= 27)
13.5
(± 8.18)
(n= 27)
38.4
(± 15.4)
(n= 27)
Late (> 3 months)  1.5 g/oral  0.90
(± 0.24)
(n= 23)
24.1
(± 12.1)
(n= 23)
65.3
(± 35.4)
(n= 23)
Cardiac Transplant
Patients (bid dosing)
Time After
Transplantation
Dose/Route T max
(h)
C max
(µg/ mL)
Interdosing
Interval AUC0-12
(µg·h/ mL)
Early (Day before discharge) 1.5 g/oral 1.8
(± 1.3)
(n= 11)
11.5
(± 6.8)
(n= 11)
43.3
(± 20.8)
(n= 9) 
Late (> 6 months) 1.5 g/oral 1.1
(± 0.7)
(n= 52)
20.0
(± 9.4)
(n= 52)
54.1 *
(± 20.4)
(n= 49)
* AUC0-12 values quoted are extrapolated from data from samples collected over 4 hours.

Two 500 mg tablets have been shown to be bioequivalent to four 250 mg capsules.

Five mL of the 200 mg/mL constituted suspension have been shown to be bioequivalent to four 250 mg capsules.

Special Populations

Shown below are the mean (± SD) pharmacokinetic parameters for MPA following the administration of oral mycophenolate mofetil given as single doses to nontransplant subjects with renal or hepatic impairment.

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for MPA [mean (± SD)]
Following Single Doses of Mycophenolate Mofetil Capsules
in Chronic Renal and Hepatic Impairment 
Renal Impairment
(no. of patients)
Dose Tmax
(h)
Cmax
(µg/mL)
AUC 0- 96
(µg· h/mL)
Healthy Volunteers
GFR >80 mL/min/1.73m2
(n= 6)
1 g 0.75
(± 0.27)
25.3
(± 7.99) 
45.0
(± 22.6)
Mild Renal Impairment
GFR 50 to 80 mL/min/1.73m2
(n= 6)
1 g 0.75
(± 0.27)
26.0
(± 3.82)
59.9
(± 12.9)
Moderate Renal Impairment
GFR 25 to 49 mL/min/1.73m2
(n= 6)
1 g 0.75
(± 0.27)
19.0
(± 13.2)
52.9
(± 25.5)
Severe Renal Impairment
GFR <25 mL/min/1.73m2
(n= 7)
1 g 1.00
(± 0.41)
16.3
(± 10.8)
78.6
(± 46.4)
Hepatic Impairment
(no. of patients)
Dose Tmax
(h)
Cmax
(µg/m L)
AUC 0-48
(µg·h/mL)
Healthy Volunteers
(n= 6)
1 g 0.63
(± 0.14)
24.3
(± 5.73)
29.0
(± 5.78)
Alcoholic cirrhosis
(n= 18)
1 g 0.85
(± 0.58)
22.4
(± 10.1)
29.8
(± 10.7)

Renal Insufficiency: In a single-dose study, MMF was administered as capsule or intravenous infusion over 40 minutes. Plasma MPA AUC observed after oral dosing to volunteers with severe chronic renal impairment [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <25 mL/min/1.73m²] was about 75% higher relative to that observed in healthy volunteers (GFR >80 mL/min/1.73m²). In addition, the single-dose plasma MPAG AUC was three-to six-fold higher in volunteers with severe renal impairment than in volunteers with mild renal impairment or healthy volunteers, consistent with the known renal elimination of MPAG. No data are available on the safety of long-term exposure to this level of MPAG.

Plasma MPA AUC observed after single dose (1 g) intravenous dosing to volunteers (n= 4) with severe chronic renal impairment [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <25 mL/min/1.73m²] was 62.4 µg·h/mL (± 19.3). Multiple dosing of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with severe chronic renal impairment has not been studied (see PRECAUTIONS: General and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

In patients with delayed renal graft function posttransplant, mean MPA AUC0-12 was comparable to that seen in posttransplant patients without delayed graft function. Mean plasma MPAG AUC0-12 was 2-to 3-fold higher than in posttransplant patients without delayed graft function (see PRECAUTIONS: General and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

In 8 patients with primary non-function of the organ following renal transplantation, plasma concentrations of MPAG accumulated about 6-to 8-fold after multiple dosing for 28 days. Accumulation of MPA was about 1-to 2-fold.

The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil are not altered by hemodialysis. Hemodialysis usually does not remove MPA or MPAG. At high concentrations of MPAG (> 100 µg/mL), hemodialysis removes only small amounts of MPAG.

Hepatic Insufficiency: In a single-dose (1 g, oral) study of 18 volunteers with alcoholic cirrhosis and 6 healthy volunteers, hepatic MPA glucuronidation processes appeared to be relatively unaffected by hepatic parenchymal disease when pharmacokinetic parameters of healthy volunteers and alcoholic cirrhosis patients within this study were compared. However, it should be noted that for unexplained reasons, the healthy volunteers in this study had about a 50% lower AUC as compared to healthy volunteers in other studies, thus making comparisons between volunteers with alcoholic cirrhosis and healthy volunteers difficult. Effects of hepatic disease on this process probably depend on the particular disease. Hepatic disease with other etiologies may show a different effect. In a single-dose (1 g) intravenous study of 6 volunteers with alcoholic cirrhosis, MPA AUC was 44.1 µg·h/mL (± 15.5).

Pediatrics: Very limited pharmacokinetic data are available for pediatric renal transplant recipients. Data on these patients are presented in the table below:

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for MPA [mean ± (SD)]
Following Multiple Oral Doses of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pediatric Renal
Transplant Patients 21 Days Posttransplant
Age Range Dose Tmax
(h)
Cmax
(µg/mL)
AUC 0-12
(µg·h/mL)
³3 mo to <6 yr
(Mean = 2.75)
(n= 4)
15 mg/kg bid 1.25
(± 0.87)
3.70
(± 2.08)
13.6
(± 8.69)
³6 yr to <12 yr
(Mean = 9.0)
(n= 4)
15 mg/kg bid 0.50
(± 0.00)
13.5
(± 4.48)
23.4
(± 2.84)
³12 yr to 18 yr
(Mean = 15.6)
(n= 5)
15 mg/kg bid 0.50
(± 0.00)
13.2
(± 6.86)
30.0
(± 8.34)
³6 yr to <12 yr
(Mean = 9.8)
(n= 5)
23 mg/kg bid 1.46
(± 0.79)
17.0
(± 20.0)
40.1
(± 17.6)
³12 yr to 18 yr
(Mean = 14.6)
(n= 6)
23 mg/kg bid 1.32
(± 0.76)
11.5
(± 10.2)
31.1
(± 11.4)

Gender: Data obtained from several studies were pooled to look at any gender-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of MPA (data were adjusted to 1 g oral dose). Mean (± SD) MPA AUC0-12 for males (n= 79) was 32.0 (± 14.5) and for females (n= 41) was 36.5 (± 18.8) µg·h/mL while mean (± SD) MPA Cmax was 9.96 (± 6.19) in the males and 10.6 (± 5.64) µg/mL in the females. These differences are not of clinical significance.

Geriatric Use: Pharmacokinetics in the elderly have not been studied.

CLINICAL STUDIES

The safety and efficacy of CellCept in combination with corticosteroids and cyclosporine for the prevention of organ rejection were assessed in renal transplant patients in three randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials and in cardiac patients in one randomized double-blind, multicenter trial.

Renal Transplant

These three studies compared two dose levels of oral CellCept (1 g bid and 1.5 g bid) with azathioprine (2 studies) or placebo (1 study) when administered in combination with cyclosporine (Sandimmune®) and corticosteroids to prevent acute rejection episodes. One study also included antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM®) induction therapy. These studies are described by geographic location of the investigational sites. One study was conducted in the USA at 14 sites, one study was conducted in Europe at 20 sites, and one study was conducted in Europe, Canada, and Australia at a total of 21 sites.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients in each treatment group who experienced treatment failure within the first 6 months after transplantation (defined as biopsyproven acute rejection on treatment or the occurrence of death, graft loss or early termination from the study for any reason without prior biopsy-proven rejection). CellCept, when administered with antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM®) induction (one study) and with cyclosporine and corticosteroids (all three studies), was compared to the following three therapeutic regimens: (1) antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM®) induction/azathioprine/cyclosporine/corticosteroids, (2) azathioprine/cyclosporine/corticosteroids, and (3) cyclosporine/corticosteroids.

CellCept, in combination with corticosteroids and cyclosporine reduced (statistically significant at the <0.05 level) the incidence of treatment failure within the first 6 months following transplantation. The following tables summarize the results of these studies. These tables show (1) the proportion of patients experiencing treatment failure, (2) the proportion of patients who experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection on treatment, and (3) early termination, for any reason other than graft loss or death, without a prior biopsy-proven acute rejection episode. Patients who prematurely discontinued treatment were followed for the occurrence of death or graft loss, and the cumulative incidence of graft loss and patient death are summarized separately. Patients who prematurely discontinued treatment were not followed for the occurrence of acute rejection after termination. More patients discontinued receiving CellCept (without prior biopsy-proven rejection, death or graft loss) than discontinued in the control groups, with the highest rate in the CellCept 3 g/day group. Therefore, the acute rejection rates may be underestimates, particularly in the CellCept 3 g/day group.

Renal Transplant Studies
Incidence of Treatment Failure
(Biopsy-proven Rejection or Early Termination for Any Reason)
USA Study

(N= 499 patients)
CellCept
2 g/day
(n= 167 patients)
CellCept
3 g/day
(n= 166 patients)
Azathioprine
1 to 2 mg/kg/day
(n= 166 patients) 
All treatment failures 31.1% 31.3% 47.6%
Early termination
without prior acute
rejection *
9.6% 12.7% 6.0%
Biopsy- proven
rejection episode on
treatment
19.8% 17.5% 38.0%
Europe/ Canada/
Australia Study
(N= 503 patients)
CellCept
2 g/day
(n= 173 patients)
CellCept
3 g/day
(n= 164 patients)
Azathioprine
100 to 150 mg/day
(n= 166 patients)
All treatment failures 38.2% 34.8% 50.0%
Early termination
without prior acute
rejection*
13.9% 15.2% 10.2%
Biopsy- proven
rejection episode on
treatment
19.7% 15.9% 35.5%
Europe Study

(N= 491 patients)
CellCept
2 g/day
(n= 165 patients)
CellCept
3 g/day
(n= 160 patients)
Placebo

(n= 166 patients)
All treatment failures 30.3%  38.8% 56.0%
Early termination
without prior acute
rejection *
11.5% 22.5% 7.2%
Biopsy- proven
rejection episode on
treatment
17.0% 13.8% 46.4%

*Does not include death and graft loss as reason for early termination.

Cumulative incidence of 12-month graft loss and patient death are presented below. No advantage of CellCept with respect to graft loss and patient death was established. Numerically, patients receiving CellCept 2 g/day and 3 g/day experienced a better outcome than controls in all three studies; patients receiving CellCept 2 g/day experienced a better outcome than CellCept 3 g/day in two of the three studies. Patients in all treatment groups who terminated treatment early were found to have a poor outcome with respect to graft loss and patient death at 1 year.

Renal Transplant Studies
Cumulative Incidence of Combined Graft Loss
and Patient Death at 12 Months
Study CellCept
2 g/ day
CellCept
3 g/ day
Control
(Azathioprine or
Placebo)
USA 8.5% 11.5% 12.2%
Europe/ Canada/ Australia 11.7% 11.0% 13.6%
Europe 8.5% 10.0% 11.5%

Cardiac Transplant

A double-blind, randomized, comparative, parallel-group, multicenter study in primary cardiac transplant recipients was performed at 20 centers in the United States, one in Canada, five in Europe and two in Australia. The total number of patients enrolled was 650; 72 never received study drug and 578 received study drug. Patients received CellCept 1.5 g bid (n= 289) or azathioprine 1.5 to 3 mg/kg/day (n= 289), in combination with cyclosporine (Sandimmune® or Neoral®) and corticosteroids as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. The two primary efficacy endpoints were: (1) the proportion of patients who, after transplantation, had at least one endomyocardial biopsy-proven rejection with hemodynamic compromise, or were retransplanted or died, within the first 6 months, and (2) the proportion of patients who died or were transplanted during the first 12 months following transplantation. Patients who prematurely discontinued treatment were followed for the occurrence of allograft rejection for up to 6 months and for the occurrence of death for 1 year.

Rejection: No difference was established between CellCept and azathioprine (AZA) with respect to biopsy-proven rejection with hemodynamic compromise, as presented below.

Rejection at 6 Months
  All Patients  Treated Patients
AZA
N = 323
CellCept
N = 327
AZA
N = 289
CellCept
N = 289
Biopsy-proven rejection with
hemodynamic compromise *
121 (38%)  120 (37%) 100 (35%) 92 (32%)

*Hemodynamic compromise occurred if any of the following criteria were met: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ³20 mm or a 25% increase; cardiac index <2.01/min/m² or a 25% decrease; ejection fraction £30%; pulmonary artery oxygen saturation £60% or a 25% decrease; presence of new S3 gallop; fractional shortening was £20% or a 25% decrease; inotropic support required to manage the clinical condition.

Survival: CellCept was shown to be at least as effective as AZA in preventing death or retransplantation at 1 year, as presented below.

Death or Retransplantation at 1 Year
  All Patients  Treated Patients
AZA
N = 323
CellCept
N = 327
AZA
N = 289
CellCept
N = 289
Death or
Retransplantation
49 (15.2%)  42 (12.8%) 33 (11.4%) 18 (6.2%)

top


Popular Searches:

weight loss

ultram

penis enlargement

hydrocodone

antibiotic